Fire Behavior or Firefighter Behavior? Pennsylvania House Fire Video


Our views must be balanced to include what may happen, what is obviously happening and why it is happening


The video of a house fire in Dunmore, Pennsylvania last week became popular as it was viewed on the various blogs and Facebook pages. The theme of discussion among some of those was the fire’s behavior, notably the flashover. Here is what the UL Firefighter Safety Research Institute had to say on Facebook,

“Ventilate (create a flow path from where the fire is to a lower pressure outside) and don't apply water and the result is not new. Once the windows are opened conditions right inside those windows may improve briefly but as heat moves toward the windows conditions deteriorate quickly. In this video, from ventilation until flashover is around 3 minutes. Without another view and an understanding of the interior we don't know how far the fire traveled. One thing we do know is that additional openings would allow for faster fire spread.”

It is important that we continue to learn as much as we can about fire behavior in today’s structures and that we support those who are investing in making lessons out of the research in this subject. One thing that we do not want to lose sight of is that while the latest findings may (or may not) be a catalyst for change in your department’s tactics, the knowledge of fire behavior is not a substitute for some of the simple basics such as bringing a hand tool to work.

In an earlier post Jim McCormack shared his personal idea that similar advances in knowledge could be made if 20 percent of the money spent in research were directed towards practical firefighter training [1]. Some readers interpreted Jim’s post as a call for all research to be discontinued or that the fire service should continue to operate as it has done decades ago. In contrast, Jim’s post actually raises the issue that efforts spent in research and the probable change in strategy and tactics should be matched by reinforcing the basics in firefighting that for the most part are not challenged by the latest research. An example of this is the Dunmore video.

While we can discuss the fire dynamics being witnessed and point out that the ventilation of the windows leads to the pyrolysis at those windows, what isn’t being challenged is that there are five firefighters operating with some visual intent to make entry and only one among them has a hand tool. Add to this that at one window where we can identify an upcoming flashover we see a dry hoseline being advanced through said window. We could also throw in the unfastened SCBA waist strap as well since we are discussing some basics.

Science tells us this is hot, but what does our behavior tell us?

Science tells us this is hot, but what does our behavior tell us?

The point is not to pit research against training of the basics but to marry the two in a balanced way so that the basics are not put aside while everyone discusses how to change their tactics to match the latest research. Before anyone rushes to comment, we are not saying that those who are doing the valuable research are pushing aside the basics. What we are saying is that readers and those who use such videos to discuss fire behavior should also make it a point to identify where there are problems in foundational basics (and remember that there is no such thing as the perfect fire; we all make mistakes). We may well begin fighting fires as they do in Europe but that doesn’t mean that we should neglect simple lessons such as using a tool for ventilation instead of your hands; wearing your SCBA properly; and meeting the area of flashover with a charged hoseline.

A soldier can receive the latest "in-country" training and intelligence on his enemy, but if he walks point with his rifle slung over his shoulder like he's taking a stroll through the mall, he'll be killed fast. Firefighters are no different.


  1. “Firefighting Back to the Future” Jim McCormack, January 10, 2014. Backstep Firefighter


“Truck Company Hand Tools” Jim McCormack, May 2013. FireRescue Magazine/

“Common-Sense Fireground Ventilation” Jim McCormack, September 2011. FireRescue Magazine/

“A Refresher Course in VES” Jim McCormack, January 2012. FireRescue Magazine/

“New Developments in Reading Fire” Shan Raffel, December 2013. FireRescue Magazine/

“Dry & Wet Hoseline Stretches” Kirby and Lakamp, December 2011. FireRescue Magazine/

"Afternoon Blaze at the 400 block of Mortimer Street" Dunmore Firefighters Local 860 website


Find us on Google+

"Captain Anonymous Doesn't Ride Here" Read our comment policy


Bill Carey is the online public safety news and blog manager with PennWell Public Safety, or more specifically FireRescue Magazine/,, and Bill started in the fire service, as a third generation firefighter in 1986, on the eastern shore of Maryland and then continued after moving to Prince George's County. He served as a volunteer sergeant and lieutenant at Hyattsville where he met Chris Hebert and Dave Ianonne, the creators of Bill went to work for them back in 2001 and after they transitioned away to new, bigger projects, he was hired by them again in 2009. Bill's writing has been on, Fire Engineering, FireRescue Magazine,, the Jones and Bartlett 2010 edition of "Fire Officer: Principles and Practice", The Secret List and

You are not authorized to see this part
Please, insert a valid App IDotherwise your plugin won't work.

1 Comment

  • Nate Quartier says:

    Or maybe "Fire(fighter) Behavior"?

    Well said.  I'm not on Facebook, so I haven't seen the comments regarding Jim's post, but I often wonder (I'm not surprised, though) how things become polarized so quickly.  The message seemed pretty obvious (not to mention sensible) to me:

    "Not that there is anything against trying to find out more about both the contents that are burning and the buildings they are burning in but it really does seem that the time being spent on all of this is far exceeding the time being spent learning and performing the basic skills of suppression."

    Making basic skills second nature allows for us to focus on other things, such as evaluating conditions/results of our tactics/skills, and adjusting accordingly.  This leads to a smoother, more effective response.

2 Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins