Manhattan Scaffolding Rescue Highlights Agency Rivalry and Risk Management Decisions

Scaffold rescue highlights problems in unified command system.

In Manhattan yesterday, a scaffold came partially undone outside the 17th floor of a 21-story building on East 66th Street. The FDNY and NYPD ESU response revealed a dispute between the two agencies and differing views, as well as reports, of the immediate actions that need to be taken.

According to both the New York Post and New York Times, the ESU team lowered a member from the roof down to the three trapped workers. The FDNY simply opened an adjacent window, secured the workers and led them inside. They also did the same with the ESU member who had rappelled down. While the incident ended safely, it left many grumbling about problems within the city's unified command system and agency rivalry.

"But in a public display of inter-agency anger, FDNY Battalion Chief Michael Massucci argued that Coll took an unnecessary risk. “I didn’t see the need for him to put himself in harm’s way,” Massucci grumbled. He said the Fire Department should have been in charge. “The city protocol is that FDNY has all life, safety and rescue operations,” Massucci fumed. “Well, we’re trained to do this,” retorted Coll. “We have some of the best training and the best equipment to do this.”"

and…

"Chief Massucci, 48, a 22-year veteran, said firefighters wound up aiding the officer, too. They pulled him in through the same 17th-floor window because he could not climb back up the building’s facade and most likely did not have enough rope to reach the ground, the chief said."

 

 

Bill Carey is the daily news and blog manager for Elsevier Public Safety (FireRescue Magazine/Firefighter Nation, JEMS and LawOfficer sites.) Bill also manages the FireEMSBlogs.com network and is a former volunteer lieutenant with the Hyattsville Volunteer Fire Department in Prince George's County, Maryland.

We encourage and support constructive dialogue and debate. View our comment policy.



(function() {
var po = document.createElement(‘script’); po.type = ‘text/javascript’; po.async = true;
po.src = ‘https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js’;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);
})();

Find us on Google+

You are not authorized to see this part
Please, insert a valid App IDotherwise your plugin won't work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Backstep Firefighter

“To provide a point of critical thought about certain acts and events in the fire service while incorporating behavioral education and commentary in a referenced format.”

FE Talk: Humpday Hangout

Comments
Jeff chandler
44.7 Percent
Very good explanation! I have been known to have the same rant.
2015-01-17 03:58:59
Anthony Correia
44.7 Percent
Dave i agree with your whole post. However the one thing I'm not experiencing or seeing is the over safetyifcation. While i hear words spoke about being safe when possible, but not sacrificing service for safety. If anything, i see firefighters more aggressive than when i started many years back due to the increased protection…
2015-01-14 14:37:28
Jon Newton
44.7 Percent
Well done. You make some awesome points. In regards to the "numbers".....(and kind of backing up your thought of changing tactics), we have often wondered why there is so much emphasis on RIT and the RIT/Industrial complex. I'm on Chicago and have worked in the Chicago Suburbs for almost 20 years. We've seen the advent…
2015-01-14 04:15:23
Marshall Sampietro
44.7 Percent
spot on....
2015-01-02 14:43:50
Ron Ayotte
44.7 Percent
“Over safetyification”... Dave, that is the best description of what those who want to prevent us from doing the job want to do to the job.
2014-12-31 16:29:29
AFTDIMage
BostonFireGearImage
Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins