The Area of Refuge and “Experience Makeup”

The area of refuge only applies to truckies forcing apartment doors, correct?

Refuge ref-uge (noun, verb) shelter or protection from danger, trouble, etc. a place of shelter, protection, or safety.

It is common in our culture and operations to expect engine companies to get as close as safely possible to the seat of the fire in order to make the most efficient attack possible (or most efficient as scientific research and field application have proven). The problem in this approach is that the experience of being tactically close is that the tell tale signs of this have led to "experience makeup." The "salty" look is equated with aggressiveness and runs counter towards "too safe".

 

Calling for water.

 

Hoseline begins to be filled.

 

The point here isn't that they should have abandoned their positioned and pulled the blitz line, writing off the structure. The point is, don't allow your need for "experience makeup" and a twisted sense of "aggressive firefighting" to damage a good fire attack. You don't know if that line will get charged, if a length will burst or if the fire conditions will quickly change (i.e. Riverdale, MD; San Francisco, CA; Prince William County, VA). Had the nozzle team in this video not gotten the water they needed, the members would have had to raise themselves up, into the flames, in order the access the ladder. Yes, no problem so long as they wear all their PPE, I get that and have been there personally. But ask yourself this: in all the time you practice making the attack, do you give equal time to practicing how to recover when things go sour? It happens all the time and we have the abundance of reports highlighting how common basic skills were forgotten.

 

Simple solution: Back down to the ladder, wait for water and when it comes, open the line, drive the stream into the ceiling area, move in and kill it.

Still just as aggressive and utilizes an area of refuge. The makeup will still come, but in a more respectable way.

 

 

Bill Carey is the daily news and blog manager for Elsevier Public Safety (FireRescue Magazine/Firefighter Nation, JEMS and LawOfficer sites.) Bill also manages the FireEMSBlogs.com network and is a former volunteer lieutenant with the Hyattsville Volunteer Fire Department in Prince George's County, Maryland.

We encourage and support constructive dialogue and debate. View our comment policy.



(function() {
var po = document.createElement(‘script’); po.type = ‘text/javascript’; po.async = true;
po.src = ‘https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js’;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);
})();

Find us on Google+

You are not authorized to see this part
Please, insert a valid App IDotherwise your plugin won't work.

7 Comments

  • This is not aggressive firefighting! If it was we would have seen a charged line already n place, before the salt started to spread so quickly. “Common skills forgotten.” Maybe never taught/learned.

  • Bill Carey says:

    I figured the first comment might take a shot calling me a sally, but instead it's an endorsement. ;)

     

    Bill Carey

  • Brooks says:

    Where’s this scientific evidence for getting as close as possible before applying water? Sounds interesting. Perhaps we should get rid of the nozzles and just use open butts?

  • Tri Townsend says:

    Why did he not control the door and only open it after he a charged line in place, instead he opens the door and feeds the fire to do more damage.

  • Bill Carey says:

    Sean. It's dated, from many years ago and is currently changing.

    Bill Carey

  • Sean Brooks says:

    Well, then, why reference it?  A writer claims scientific legitimacy to bolster a point, and cites the reference.  If you have no reference, or don't believe the reference, why are you using it to justify your position?  Seems disingenuous.
    You've got a bully pulpit.  Some of your impressionable readers might believe what you write — and go try to roll around in the fire rather than hitting it at max standoff range and then moving in.  

    • Bill Carey says:

      Sean,
      You have misunderstood what is written. Years ago, in my own experience, when Maryland delivered its Basic Fire course, the direct attack method involved the nozzle team getting as close to the seat of the fire as possible to make a quick, efficient knockdown; minimally disrupt the thermal layers and provide cover for the primary search in the immediate fire area. Over time, that has slightly changed, and more recently involves the science I have loosely referred to (which I endorse) behind fire behavior, ventilation and transitional attack. At the end, I even explained that the better course of action for the firefighters in this video were to have backed off the balcony and onto the ladder while waiting for water – rather, even better, have the charged line in position before accessing the balcony.

      I offer a better approach and attitude, instead of simply sharing a video and letting it go that “Hey that looked cool, they really got up close on that one.” and rest on getting page views and Facebook shares. Hardly disingenuous, as there is nothing written that is hypocritical in this.

      Bill Carey

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Backstep Firefighter

“To provide a point of critical thought about certain acts and events in the fire service while incorporating behavioral education and commentary in a referenced format.”

FE Talk: Humpday Hangout

Comments
Ron Ayotte
“FEAR” by Ric Jorge
Ric, excellent article. Your FD is not the only one that suffers from TAS (Training Anxiety Syndrome). Same circus, different community. As far as seeking help from an EAP, I did take advantage of my community's EAP 8 years into my career. I was heading down the road to a separation/divorce after I got promoted…
2014-12-04 16:04:47
Mike McAdams
Who Looks After The Victims?
Captain LeBlanc, Great point in the blog debating the new and old techniques and how to blend them into that first minutes on the fire ground. One of the first points stated was “Unless they know your manpower, resources and abilities, and are standing in that front lawn at 2:00 a.m., all they can do…
2014-12-02 14:45:23
Ruel Douvillier
Who Looks After The Victims?
I suspect these new tactics are all related to the NFPA standard that came out a few years ago recommending higher manpower on apparatus than the authorities having jurisdiction were prepared to implement. For the 30+ years that I've been fighting fires, UL and NIST have been using the data that they gained by setting…
2014-12-02 11:48:44
Joseph carroll
Who Looks After The Victims?
I work in a dept with 2 man Engine cos, man powers is an issue with our first due assignment. (3 engs,2 Trks , Batt Chief). Usually 13 Firefighters on the assignment. At times the exterior attack has no option, heavy fire too include exposures etc. some new leaders feel that this exterior attack is…
2014-12-01 19:05:51
Brian
Who Looks After The Victims?
Am I missing the old SSLEEVES-OCD pneumonic??? seems that one. It addressed alot of the things we have to think of, and the new Slicers is something that I think in right circumstances and construction would make sense, but at other times might be completely useless. I have watched and read alot of the NIST…
2014-12-01 02:10:06
Blood On Our Hands
Blood On Our Hands
Lights and Sirens
Lights and Sirens
Goodreads Book Giveaway
Goodreads Book Giveaway
Emergency Feeding
Emergency Feeding
Easy-Button Firefighting
Easy-Button Firefighting

AFTDIMage
BostonFireGearImage
Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins