“Those Fires”?Maybe Andy Fredericks was Right.

VCOS speaker puts you in service faster than a residential sprinkler.

At the IAFC's Volunteer Chief Officer Symposium in Flordia last week, an interesting statement was made about the future of our nation's fire service. USFA Prevention and Leadership Development Branch Chief Ken Farmer was speaking in Clearwater about how the fire service must adapt to change, Much of what was written about Farmer's beliefs are correct, that we should begin to look earnestly at the changing populations we serve and our educational process. Unfortunately two statements about firefighting are disconcerting to me and should be to you.

"Stop fighting interior fires," he said. "Don't go into those fires anymore. It's not worth it. They build disposable houses these days. Our lives are not disposable."

By fighting fires from the outside, he believes firefighters will be safer and more line of duty deaths will be prevented.

"Every day I drive by the flag. If you've ever been to the National Fire Academy and never seen the flags at half staff, you haven't been there for more than 24 hours."

Understanding statements in the context given is key. "Those fires"? Which fires are "those fires"? Vacants? Lightweight truss? Non-sprinklered? Or are "those fires" interior fires?

As I have always written, and continue to do so, to ask you to challenge and question what may not make sense, are you expected to believe, by the speaker's statements, that the large reason why the flags fly at half mast for nearly every day at Emmitsburg is beacuse firefighters are dieing inside burning buildings?

The numbers say something very different. Don't just take my word for it. Look at the USFA's database.

Along with a decline in fire deaths, fire-related injuries also are down. A report released by the NFPA showed that such injuries last year were down to the lowest level in 30 years and decreased by 8 percent from 2009.

"How cool is that? That's a pretty amazing statistic," he said. "It also shows demand is down."

So, if the number of reported injuries is down then it means that the demand for our services is down? I'm not a math expert, but I'm quite sure there is little correlation between the public's need for us to respond to their fires and other emergencies and our being injured while on duty.

Maybe Andy was right when he said "don't worry about that nozzle kid, cause we don't do fires anymore."

Related

"USFA Official: Fire Service Must Adapt to Change" Peluso, Firehouse.com November 2011

We encourage and support constructive dialogue and debate. View our comment policy.


(function() {
var po = document.createElement(‘script’); po.type = ‘text/javascript’; po.async = true;
po.src = ‘https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js’;
var s = document.getElementsByTagName(‘script’)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(po, s);
})();

You are not authorized to see this part
Please, insert a valid App IDotherwise your plugin won't work.

1 Comment

  • Joe says:

    I'll only stop fighting interior fires when I retire. We save lives and property, you do that by going into fires and putting them out quickly.  Yes there are fires we shouldn't go into, but making blanket statements about "new disposable buildings" doesn't cut it. Even fires in those buildings can be put out from the inside, you just need to be smarter about when and when not to go in. But I guess pushing ourselves to be smarter isn't good anymore, we should just avoid fire instead.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

Backstep Firefighter

“To provide a point of critical thought about certain acts and events in the fire service while incorporating behavioral education and commentary in a referenced format.”

FE Talk: Humpday Hangout

Comments
Dave LeBlanc
Of Falsehoods and Agendas
first of all, thank for the responses and interest. I apologize for the delay. Discussion is good.... While I took a shot at "some guy named Eddie' it was a tongue in cheek response to a similar shot taken by the Chief in response to one of my blogs. While the article was less about…
2015-02-28 14:26:28
Michael Furci
The Greatest Risk, Taking No Risk At All
Great article.
2015-02-28 05:28:17
Bill Carey
Of Falsehoods and Agendas
Editor's Note: Dave LeBlanc will replay to your comments soon, but he is currently recuperating from a surgery and is unable to type well at the moment. Thank you.
2015-02-27 22:26:19
Bob Davis
Of Falsehoods and Agendas
I am not sure how to take this article or some of the comments after. As one of the training officers in my mid-sized volunteer department, I have gone through SLICERS and RECEO-VS both the discussions and the science behind them. While I can't say I have seen everything about this, all I have ever…
2015-02-27 19:31:32
THE TRUTH OF SLICE-RS – NO AGENDAS OR FALSEHOODS HERE | Modern Fire Behavior
Of Falsehoods and Agendas
[…] - See more at: http://www.backstepfirefighter.com/2015/02/26/of-falsehoods-and-agendas/#sthash.129hX0zu.dpuf […]
2015-02-27 15:24:44
AFTDIMage
BostonFireGearImage
Plugin from the creators ofBrindes Personalizados :: More at PlulzWordpress Plugins